March 27, 2012
by Sammy J
0 comments

photo by John Levett
Maybe i haven’t been paying close enough attention. I know there’s been a bunch of brutalist building under threat of demolition over the last few years, but I guess it hits home when one I’m reading about is slated for destruction. In fact my next post on the topic [spoiler alert] is going to be about the Smithsons.
From BDOnline
Tower Hamlets council has approved plans to demolish Robin Hood Gardens in east London.
The Smithson-designed estate will be razed to the ground to make way for up to 1,575 new homes on a wider 7.7ha site as part of the £500 million Blackwall Reach regeneration scheme.
According to the masterplan drawn up by Horden Cherry Lee, working with Swan Housing and Countryside Properties and architect Aedas, this will include two towers, 40 and 35 storeys high.
Wow. I’ve never been a particularly passionate architectural conservationist, but I find this pretty tragic. Especially when one considers the planned replacement (as with the Paul Rudolph building I mentioned a little while ago) is not that impressive. In this case it’s not as horrible, but is it that much of an improvement over the exisiting? I guess I’m not really in a position to comment on that.
There’s 2 things in particular in this situation and in the many other related to the demolition of modernist buildings that I consider to be, at least in part, failures on the part of architects the world over.
The first is that we haven’t communicated (or perhaps even cared about) the environmental impact of demolition and replacement of exisiting buildings. Carbon outputs and other impacts are simply not mentioned in discussions on this topic. We don’t seem to have let enough people know what the impacts are.
The second is not a new issue. We haven’t given people an understanding of modernism that allows them to see for themselves the value of this work. I have no idea about how we might do this, but in any conversation I’ve had with people who aren’t formally trained in architecture, modernism is either hated, or valued only for its aesthetic appeal.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the notion of the Starchitect is in part to blame. If you ask the average layperson to name an architect, you’re bound to hear the names Wright, Zaha, Gehry, Foster, Mies, Le Corbusier and so on. (It’s Mies’ birthday today, and anyone with an iota of curiosity wo goes onto Google will discover who he is thanks to their Google Doodle for the day.) If you ask an architecture student, they’ll probably mention a few more, including Koolhaas, Liebeskind, and various Pritzker winners. But if you were to ask people to name artists, more often than not they’ll have a long list, ranging from the Renaissance (or even earlier) to at least the 20th century. But people won’t know who the Smithsons are. Which I find a little sad.
With that in mind, I’ll get on with my next post, devoted to them, as soon as I can.

photo by John Levett